Just Four Fish?

Is delete-and-replace the future of our last wild food?

We think of fish more as “flesh archetypes” than as species (photo by Paul Greenberg)

One of the most terrifying days for a writer is the day after you’ve sold a book proposal.

For some time I had been writing about seafood and the oceans for the New York Times, getting progressively more interest from readers who, up until that time, had been only really interested in terrestrial agriculture; “landfood” as I’ve come to call it over the years.

A shift of this magnitude hadn’t been seen since humans came out of their caves and started domesticating cows, sheep, goats and pigs.

Unbeknownst to landfood reporters, the ocean, I was starting to realize, was undergoing a massive shift, completely below the radar (or sonar as the case may be). Whereas 100 years ago, nearly everything we ate from the sea was wild, in the late aughts we were just approaching the threshold whereby more than half of our fish and shellfish would come from farms. A shift of this magnitude hadn’t been seen since humans came out of their caves and started domesticating cows, sheep, goats and pigs. And, if we weren’t careful, I began to understand, we ran the risk of prosecuting the same delete-and-replace war at sea as we’d waged with wild flora and fauna on land.